About a year ago, the landmark criminal trial concerning the March 22, 2016 attacks commenced, initiating a prolonged deliberation spanning over nine months of hearings. Many involved in this trial found themselves obligated to attend daily, immersing themselves in the information disseminated through the assize court, media outlets, and society at large. Victims and survivors, recognized as integral participants in the Belgian criminal justice system, were deeply entrenched in the daily proceedings, prompting contemplation on additional measures to complement the existing individualized support.
Through a fruitful collaboration with Jacques Roisin, a psychoanalyst, victimologist, educator, and trainer, we conceived an actionable solution. Though commonly referred to as "discussion groups," we opted for a name more aptly suited to our context: "encounter groups." These groups initially comprised approximately twenty participants who were victims or survivors. We deliberately structured the groups to be open and flexible, devoid of any rigid constraints, facilitating the exchange of perceptions and experiences among individuals impacted by various attacks, regardless of their trial involvement.
Initially, our aim was to provide a dedicated moment and space for open discussions where emotions could be freely expressed and acknowledged. Gradually, distinct themes began to surface, and we collectively identified and prioritized topics based on participants' needs. These discussions, held monthly on Saturdays, became a platform for an array of profound reflections and exchanges. Throughout our sessions, we delved into a myriad of subjects, including frustrations stemming from perceived injustices within legal, administrative, and political systems, the pervasive social and familial ruptures caused by trauma, the complexities of guilt and anger management, navigating feelings of shame, and even grappling with compassion towards the accused. Central to our discourse was the concept of healing and the multifaceted emotions engendered by the criminal trial.
With the skilled co-facilitation of Jacques Roisin and David Polizzi, alongside the meticulous transcriptions provided by Morgane Vincart, an anthropologist and victimologist, the depth and nuance of our exchanges were preserved, enriching each subsequent session. Discussions on legitimacy, approached with humility and dignity, underscored the group's commitment to solidarity and kindness, fostering an environment conducive to individual exploration and resolution.
Today, as the "Reflection Group," we transition into a post-trial phase, marked by new inquiries and challenges. Together, we embark on this continued journey towards recovery, united in our shared experiences and collective resilience.
